Soap-bubble multilocular lesion expanding the mandible
38-year-old male
§Chief complaint
Slowly enlarging hard swelling of the lower jaw for about 2 years
§Medical & dental history
- 01No systemic disease
- 02No previous jaw surgery
- 03Teeth in the region mobile but vital
- 04No history of trauma or infection
§Clinical examination
- 01Marked buccal and lingual bony expansion from 45 to the angle, 50 mm across
- 02Egg-shell crackling over the thinnest area; overlying mucosa intact
- 0346 and 47 grade II mobile, both vital
- 04Lower lip sensation normal, no cervical lymphadenopathy
§ figuresFigures (5)
Fig. 1Ameloblastoma
“Ameloblastoma” · Drg.AdiPratama · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons
Fig. 2エナメル上皮腫 濾胞型の組織像
“Ameloblastoma (Follicular Type)” · Baldanders · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons
Fig. 3ameloblastoma
“Ameloblastoma1” · Drg.AdiPratama · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons
Verified open-access images only, reproduced for education under their stated licences · no AI-generated or illustrative artwork · Ameloblastoma figures pending faculty review.
§Differential diagnosis
§Final diagnosis
Conventional (multicystic) ameloblastoma, follicular pattern
Gross buccolingual expansion with soap-bubble loculi, knife-edge root resorption and vital teeth is the classic pattern; incisional biopsy showing follicular islands with peripheral palisading, reverse nuclear polarity and stellate reticulum-like centres confirms it.
§Investigations
- 01Incisional biopsy under local anaesthesia
- 02Pulp testing — teeth vital, excluding an inflammatory origin
- 03Routine bloods and anaesthetic assessment for resection
§Radiology
- 01OPG — multilocular soap-bubble radiolucency 60 mm with knife-edge resorption of 46/47 roots
- 02CT with 3D reconstruction — buccal cortex perforated in two areas, inferior alveolar canal displaced, extent mapped for resection margins
§Treatment plan
- 01Segmental resection with 10-15 mm bony margins and one uninvolved anatomical barrier
- 02Immediate reconstruction with a reconstruction plate and free fibula flap
- 03Dental rehabilitation with implants once the graft consolidates
§Surgical procedure
- 01Submandibular approach with marginal mandibular nerve preservation
- 02Segmental resection from 44 to the sigmoid notch, margins confirmed by frozen section
- 03Free fibula osteocutaneous flap shaped in two segments, fixed with a load-bearing plate
- 04Microvascular anastomosis to the facial artery and vein
§Histopathology report
Follicular islands of odontogenic epithelium in a fibrous stroma; peripheral tall columnar cells with hyperchromatic nuclei polarised away from the basement membrane and subnuclear vacuolation, with loose stellate reticulum-like centres. Margins free of tumour. Conventional ameloblastoma.
§Follow-up & outcome
- 016 weeks — flap viable, occlusion maintained
- 026 months — bony union at both osteotomy sites
- 03Annual OPG surveillance for 10 years given late recurrence risk
Outcome: Disease-free at 4 years with an implant-supported prosthesis and acceptable facial contour.
§Discussion
- 01Conventional ameloblastoma is locally aggressive; conservative curettage recurs in 50-90% of cases, whereas resection with margins recurs in under 15%.
- 02BRAF V600E mutations are present in most mandibular ameloblastomas and open a targeted therapy option in unresectable disease.
- 03Recurrence may appear more than 10 years later, so lifelong surveillance is advised.
§Clinical pearls / learning points
- 01Knife-edge root resorption with soap-bubble loculi should raise ameloblastoma before any cyst.
- 02Enucleation is inadequate for the conventional multicystic variant.
- 03Unicystic luminal ameloblastoma in a young patient can be managed more conservatively — the histological subtype changes the plan.
§Viva questions
What margin do you take for a conventional ameloblastoma?
10-15 mm of radiographically normal bone plus an uninvolved anatomical barrier such as periosteum or mucosa.
Name the histological subtypes.
Follicular, plexiform, acanthomatous, granular cell, desmoplastic and basal cell.
Which molecular mutation is common?
BRAF V600E, particularly in mandibular lesions; SMO mutations are more typical of maxillary lesions.
§MCQs
Q1Reverse polarity of the basal cell nuclei is characteristic of:
Q2The recurrence rate after simple curettage of a conventional multicystic ameloblastoma is approximately:
§ evidenceReferences & Evidence
Current Classification
WHO Classification of Head and Neck Tumours
5th Edition — Volume 9
WHO Classification of Tumours Editorial Board · 2022
The authoritative international classification of head and neck, odontogenic and salivary gland tumours. Current terminology on this site follows this edition.
Evidence summary
Highest level of evidence linked to this page: WHO / Official Classification.
- L1 · Classification — 3
- L3 · Systematic review — 1
- L4 · Research — 2
- L6 · Textbook — 3
1 linked source was published from 2024 onwards. Where guidance is limited or contested, rely on the higher-level sources above rather than this summary. Educational use only — not a substitute for clinical judgement.
Content last reviewed
September 2026
Evidence last reviewed
September 2026
Next scheduled review
September 2027
Review status
EVIDENCE REVIEWED
Search latest PubMed evidence
Last literature search: 7 September 2026
Current Classification
WHO Classification of Tumours Editorial Board. IARC / World Health Organization · 2022
The authoritative international classification of head and neck, odontogenic and salivary gland tumours. Current terminology on this site follows this edition.
Vered M, Wright JM. Head and neck pathology · 2022 · 16(1):63-75
Summary of odontogenic and maxillofacial bone tumour changes in the 5th edition WHO classification.
IARC / WHO. IARC · 2022
Continuously updated online edition of the WHO head and neck tumour classification.
Systematic Reviews & Meta-Analyses
Antonoglou GN, Sándor GK. Journal of cranio-maxillo-facial surgery : official publication of the European Association for Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgery · 2015 · 43(1):149-57
Systematic review comparing recurrence after conservative versus radical treatment of intraosseous ameloblastoma.
Key Research
Heikinheimo K, Huhtala JM, Thiel A et al.. Journal of dental research · 2019 · 98(1):54-60
Sequencing study characterising BRAF and other driver mutations in unicystic ameloblastoma.
Radiology References
Dunfee BL, Sakai O, Pistey R et al.. Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc · 2006 · 26(6):1751-68
Radiologic-pathologic correlation of benign and malignant odontogenic lesions of the jaws.
Histopathology References
Barnes L. CRC Press · 2008
Detailed histopathological reference for head and neck diagnostic criteria.
Textbook References
Neville BW, Damm DD, Allen CM et al.. Elsevier · 2024
Standard reference textbook of oral and maxillofacial pathology used throughout this atlas.
Rajendran R, Sivapathasundharam B. Elsevier · 2020
Undergraduate and postgraduate oral pathology textbook widely used in BDS and FCPS curricula.
Additional sources cited on this page
- WHO Classification of Head and Neck Tumours, 5th edition, 2022.
- Hendra FN et al. Radical vs conservative treatment of ameloblastoma. Oral Dis 2019.
§Similar cases
81 cases in the library