← Case library
OMFS-0217Dentoalveolar traumaTraumabeginnerMaxillary right central incisor (11)

Complicated crown fracture of an upper central incisor in a schoolboy

9-year-old male

Draft — educational study aid, pending faculty review.

§Chief complaint

Broken front tooth with a bleeding pink spot after falling in the playground

§Medical & dental history

  • 01Healthy, immunisations up to date including tetanus
  • 02No previous trauma; 11 immature with an open apex

§Clinical examination

  • 01Oblique crown fracture of 11 involving enamel, dentine and a 1.5 mm pinpoint pulp exposure
  • 02Tooth not mobile or displaced; percussion mildly tender
  • 03Lower lip abrasion, no embedded fragments on soft tissue radiograph
  • 04No other dental injuries; alveolus intact

§Figures

Verified clinical, radiology and histopathology images not yet available

§Differential diagnosis

Complicated crown fracture (Ellis III)Visible pulp exposure with bleeding
Uncomplicated crown fractureDentine exposed, no pulp visible
Crown-root fractureFracture extends below the gingival margin
Subluxation with crown chipMobility and sulcular bleeding predominate

§Final diagnosis

Complicated crown fracture of 11 with an immature open apex

Pulp exposure in an immature permanent incisor within hours of injury is best managed by vital pulp therapy rather than pulpectomy, to allow continued root development (apexogenesis).

§Investigations

  • 01Pulp sensibility testing of 11, 12, 21 — baseline recorded (unreliable early after trauma)
  • 02Soft tissue radiograph of the lip to exclude retained fragments
  • 03Photographs for records and possible medico-legal use

§Radiology

  • 01IOPA 11 — open apex, wide root canal, no root fracture, intact periapical tissues
  • 02Occlusal view — no alveolar fracture

§Treatment plan

  • 01Partial (Cvek) pulpotomy with calcium silicate cement within 24 hours
  • 02Composite restoration or reattachment of the fragment
  • 03Regular vitality and radiographic review for 5 years

§Surgical procedure

  • 01Rubber dam isolation, 2 mm of inflamed pulp removed with a high-speed diamond under saline irrigation
  • 02Haemostasis with sterile saline-moistened cotton, calcium silicate cement placed, sealed with glass ionomer and composite

§Follow-up & outcome

  • 016-8 weeks — asymptomatic, responds to cold
  • 026 months — continued root development on radiograph
  • 0312 and 24 months — apex closing, no periapical change; annual review to 5 years

Outcome: Pulp vitality maintained with complete root development and a stable composite restoration.

§Discussion

  • 01Cvek pulpotomy has success rates above 90% when performed early in a clean exposure with healthy remaining pulp.
  • 02Maintaining vitality in an immature tooth preserves dentine thickness and greatly reduces future root fracture risk.
  • 03Follow-up must be long term — pulp necrosis and resorption can appear years later.

§Clinical pearls / learning points

  • 01Immature tooth + pulp exposure = preserve vitality, do not pulpectomise reflexively.
  • 02Always radiograph the lip when a fragment is unaccounted for.

§Viva questions

What is the difference between apexogenesis and apexification?

Apexogenesis maintains vital pulp so the root continues developing; apexification induces a calcific barrier at the apex of a necrotic immature tooth.

Which material is preferred for pulpotomy?

A calcium silicate cement such as MTA or Biodentine.

§MCQs

Q1A Cvek pulpotomy removes:

Q2An Ellis class III fracture involves:

§ evidenceReferences & Evidence

Current Classification

WHO Classification of Tumours Online — Head and Neck

IARC / WHO · 2022

Continuously updated online edition of the WHO head and neck tumour classification.

Evidence summary

Highest level of evidence linked to this page: WHO / Official Classification.

  • L1 · Classification — 1
  • L6 · Textbook — 5

1 linked source was published from 2024 onwards. Where guidance is limited or contested, rely on the higher-level sources above rather than this summary. Educational use only — not a substitute for clinical judgement.

Content last reviewed

September 2026

Evidence last reviewed

September 2026

Next scheduled review

September 2027

Review status

EVIDENCE REVIEWED

Search latest PubMed evidence

Last literature search: 7 September 2026

Open PubMed

Current Classification

Reference #1L1 · ClassificationWHO / Classification Verified
WHO Classification of Tumours Online — Head and Neck

IARC / WHO. IARC · 2022

Continuously updated online edition of the WHO head and neck tumour classification.

DOI: Identifier not availablePMID: Identifier not available

Histopathology References

Reference #6L6 · TextbookHistopathology References Unverified
Surgical Pathology of the Head and Neck3rd Edition

Barnes L. CRC Press · 2008

Detailed histopathological reference for head and neck diagnostic criteria.

DOI: Identifier not availablePMID: Identifier not available

Textbook References

Reference #2L6 · TextbookTextbooksRecent Verified
Oral and Maxillofacial Pathology5th Edition

Neville BW, Damm DD, Allen CM et al.. Elsevier · 2024

Standard reference textbook of oral and maxillofacial pathology used throughout this atlas.

DOI: Identifier not availablePMID: Identifier not available
Reference #3L6 · TextbookTextbooks Unverified
Shafer's Textbook of Oral Pathology9th Edition

Rajendran R, Sivapathasundharam B. Elsevier · 2020

Undergraduate and postgraduate oral pathology textbook widely used in BDS and FCPS curricula.

DOI: Identifier not availablePMID: Identifier not available
Reference #4L6 · TextbookTextbooks Unverified
Contemporary Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery7th Edition

Hupp JR, Ellis E, Tucker MR. Elsevier · 2019

Core surgical textbook covering exodontia, infection, trauma and preprosthetic surgery.

DOI: Identifier not availablePMID: Identifier not available
Reference #5L6 · TextbookTextbooks Unverified
AO Principles of Internal Fixation of the Craniomaxillofacial Skeleton

Ehrenfeld M, Manson PN, Prein J. Thieme / AO Foundation · 2012

Reference standard for craniomaxillofacial trauma osteosynthesis principles and techniques.

DOI: Identifier not availablePMID: Identifier not available

Additional sources cited on this page

  1. International Association of Dental Traumatology Guidelines for fractures and luxations, 2020.

Browse the full evidence library →

§Similar cases

81 cases in the library